The Bottom Line?

NELSON-JIM-85The Sequester occurring now because of the dysfunction of Congress is good material for jokes, although it is not funny.  That those most likely to be hurt by this are those least able to bear the brunt of the effects is just a sad commentary on where we are as a nation.  It is no wonder that the US Congress is less popular that head lice, cockroaches or colonoscopies – even less popular than North Korea.

I remember a few years ago listening to a radio conversation about the US budget and all the talk was about the bottom line, about whether deficits were good or not.  Never was there any mention what kind of nation we were creating; it was if we had simply become an equity fund, nothing more.  It seems as if the creation of wealth has become the highest good, rather than the kind of country we are. It is a stretch to even think we are a nation anymore, but have become a collection of isolated individuals

If individualism has a downside, it is that there is little concern for others.  Many of those who say they love America the most, do not, I think, but rather love themselves and care little about the rest of us.  This is true, I believe, of many of those loudest about the right to own guns.  How can that right be balanced by the deaths of so many?

Our faith tradition has always emphasized the individual.  Emerson was a champion of the individual; Whitman’s poetry is often a hymn to the self.  In our congregations, though, we are also a community, not just a collection of individuals.  We have responsibilities to each other.  We get and we give.  They balance is not always easy, but our lives, if they are to be what they should be, must be both – lived both for our own self and for others.

Unlike the Congress, we will not leave behind those who need help, and unlike Congress we believe in generosity, and unlike Congress we are willing to work together, even when we disagree, for the good of the whole.  Creating a community, a beloved congregation, is hard work and it takes all of us – giving and receving.

This entry was posted in Ministers, Politics, Unitarian Universalism. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to The Bottom Line?

  1. Excellent, Jim, exactly – and well said.

    Everyone I hear talk about this (who are in charge or near there) talk about it in a kind of blood-less business-ese. Reminds me of a nasty (brutish and short) story involving my own sister.

    We were walking in Manhattan a few years ago and a homeless guy came to us on the sidewalk for spare change. I gave him 2 or 3 dollars, which wasn’t going to save his life; my sister not only refused but put her hand on his chest, and firmly pushed him away. I was a little shocked – this was my liberal, 60’s hippie girl, Joan Baez look-alike sister.

    I reminded her of this, that she used to look like Joan Baez, etc., and she had the nerve to say “he doesn’t seem to want to get ahead; in fact, most of these people don’t really want to get off the street.”

    It doesn’t make me some kind of really NICE GUY, but when I saw that man on the street, I thought how easily it could be me, anytime. Or, less selfishly, how much HE was hurting. The tears in his eyes she saw as “just being drunk” still looked like pain to me.

    This is not to attack my sister, her way of thinking may be common. She grew up as poor as I did, but she may now have a little wealth-induced amnesia. Or maybe that guy on the sidewalk didn’t interface with her business model.

    Who knows?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s